Botanica has been in conception for months. Religiously re-analysing each surface, each dimension or curve, I felt like I knew this board like a beater that you've rebuilt a thousand times.

But then the prototype came, and the object itself had its own opinions that a 3D Model on a screen cannot convey.

This is what the prototype is teaching me, and what the next prototype is built on.

(Photo by Lamy)

On Sound

The objective for Botanica’s acoustic profile was specific: warm, characterful, and cohesive across the alphas and the spacebar. I wanted presence, not a one-dimensional note.

The board that I received didn't get there.

The board was tinny.

Not pingy in the way a poorly built board is pingy, but overly restrained.
The volume of dense metal in the lower case was stifling the gasket rather than working with it. The sound had nowhere to go.

The copper mid-piece, one of the most visually striking parts about the design, was acoustically too dominant, so much excess material that instead of adding character, it removed it.

For the second prototype, the material has been reworked.
The ratio between the dense and the lighter metals have been rebalanced, and the surface areas have been carefully considered to ensure that the Poron Gasket mounting may express itself as intended instead of fighting against the mass that encloses it.

The objective has not changed, but the path to achieving it has.

On the Bottom Design

The bottom case features a leaf emblem centered on the surface.

In theory, it reads as considered: A stylised callback to the botanical concept, and split into four sections that mirror the side profile's language.

In metal, it was shallow.

The execution lacked contrast and depth.
While the updated design in the IC attempted to address this, the community feedback was clear: the bottom still felt "underbaked."

I had to reconcile with the fact that, despite my changes, it remained unconsidered.

With no expense spared, the bottom has been adjusted once more to match the care and attention the rest of the board has.

(The IC's iteration of bottom design)

(The updated bottom design)

The leaf emblem has readjusted and reduced in size.

The emblem was way too big.

It was dominating the bottom surface in a way that competed with the form rather than complement it.
A detail that size stops being a detail and starts being a statement that is saying something completely different from the rest of the board.

The proportions are now much closer to an accent, present when looking for it, and not demanding attention when you aren't.

Two other changes also come with it:

The edge breaks on the emblem have been changed: a sharp chamfer now accentuates all of the leaf rather than the outline.
Additionally, a subtle inner fillet has been added to compliment the sharp leaf, giving the leaf additional dimensionality without overstating.

Lastly, the one I'm most satisfied with:
The emblem now has a background accent that will be the same colour as the top case.
Introducing a third colour to the bottom surface that mirrors the concept of revealing a third colour in its details.
Tying this accent back to the concepts you see on the rest of the board.

On what's next

Botanica is capped at 50 units because it is the number at which I am confident in personally ensuring that every detail of production and fulfilment is held to a higher standard without compromising on either.

Botanica will not be sold as a proof of concept, but a cohesive experience that has been corrected by reality.

The first prototype exists so that the second can be better, and the second will exist so that the production run can be made even better.

This is what the process is for.